<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>John Sheehan : Blog - Latest Comments in Internet Explorer 8 Beta 1 &amp;#8211; First Impressions</title><link>http://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/</link><description>A blog by John Sheehan</description><atom:link href="https://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/internet_explorer_8_beta_1_first_impressions/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:49:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Internet Explorer 8 Beta 1 &amp;#8211; First Impressions</title><link>http://johnsheehan.me/blog/internet-explorer-8-beta-1-first-impressions/#comment-2140075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The phishing attacks will adapt to it so in the long run I don't see it as helpful. My bank for instance has nothing with their name in the URL for their online banking. How is highlighting the domain going to help in that case?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Sheehan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:49:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Explorer 8 Beta 1 &amp;#8211; First Impressions</title><link>http://johnsheehan.me/blog/internet-explorer-8-beta-1-first-impressions/#comment-2140074</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The address bar colouring is a good idea to help avoid phishing attacks, most of which use something like &lt;a href="http://somebank.com.evil.cn/internetbanking/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://somebank.com.evil.cn/internetbanking/"&gt;http://somebank.com.evil.cn...&lt;/a&gt;, so the highlighting of the TLD will make those kind of attacks more obvious&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">glenn kentwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:40:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>